Saxsons Group

Clinical evidence library · the manufacturer

DoseView™ 3D — what the literature says.

A peer-reviewed water-phantom commissioning study (Akino et al., J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014) put DoseView 3D head-to-head against PTW MP3, IBA Blue Phantom and the Sun Nuclear 3D Scanner. In the clinically critical zone — deeper than dmax — DoseView 3D had the lowest inter-variability of the cohort.

0.08% inter-variability vs reference (Akino 2014)
±0.1 mm per-axis mechanical accuracy
4 / 4 scanning systems benchmarked head-to-head
Filter
Inter-variability vs reference (deeper than dmax)
DoseView 3D
0.08%
Sun Nuclear 3D
0.13%
PTW MP3
0.16%
Comparison 2014
0.08% inter-variability deeper than dmax — lowest of the four scanning systems tested

Intra- and intervariability in beam data commissioning among water phantom scanning systems

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics — Akino, Gibbons, Neck, Chu, Das (15(4):251–258)

Head-to-head: DoseView 3D vs PTW reference
0.16% ± 0.11%
PTW reference
baseline phantom
vs
0.08% ± 0.12%
DoseView 3D
lowest in the cohort
Comparison 2014
2× tighter DoseView 3D inter-variability is half of the PTW reference figure

DoseView 3D vs PTW reference — deeper than dmax (Akino et al.)

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics — Akino, Gibbons, Neck, Chu, Das

White Papers & Background Reading

Clinical-workflow whitepaper — explains how DoseView 3D fits a real medical-physics QA workflow.

Educational & Background Videos

High-level product overview. Software walkthrough demos live on the product page.

DoseView™ 3D

More for this product

Each card opens a focused post for a specific specialty — clinical workflow and evidence, written for the persona you select.